Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 has a better rating of 76% compared to 74% of the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 245/30 R20 test, where both the Ecsta PS71 and the Pilot Sport 4 S were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Kumho Ecsta PS71 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (64%) of the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S also have A wet ratings.
# | Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R18 - R23 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | |||||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3 | 2- | |||||
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | |||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 1 | ||||||
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Rating: - | 1 | ||||||
Show test details |