Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS91 vs. Kumho PorTran KC53
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Kumho, which is a brand from South Korea. In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta PS91 has a better rating of 48% compared to 30% of the Kumho PorTran KC53. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta PS91 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Kumho PorTran KC53 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Kumho Ecsta PS91 has B wet grip rating, whereas 93% of Kumho PorTran KC53 has C rating. We also know where Ecsta PS91 is made - Korea.
| # | Kumho Ecsta PS91 | Kumho PorTran KC53 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R21 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 ? dB