Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Firestone Multiseason 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Firestone (51%). In this particular case, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S has a better rating of 73% compared to 67% of the Firestone Multiseason 2. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the HA32 Solus 4S and the Multiseason 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 93% of Kumho HA32 Solus 4S dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (94%) of the Firestone Multiseason 2 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the HA32 Solus 4S is made in China and Multiseason 2 is made in Italy.

#	Kumho HA32 Solus 4S /73%	Firestone Multiseason 2 /67%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R13 - R20	R13 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

/73%

Firestone Multiseason 2

/67%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R13 - R20

R13 - R19

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 73

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 60

Number of tests

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 10x

2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 9x

Best position in test

1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 5.

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 6.

Worst position in test

1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 15.

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 16.

Average position in tests

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 9.6

2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78

Year of the last test

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 2023

2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 2023

Best rating in test

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 Good

2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 Good

2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
66%

Firestone
Multiseason 2
63%

Wet handling

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 71%

2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 61%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 53%

Wet braking

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 71%

2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 61%

Wet circle cornering

1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 76%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 71%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 62%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 52%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S ?

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Multiseason 2
75%

Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
73%

Snow cornering

1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 61%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 60%

Snow handling

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 73%

2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 71%

Snow traction

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 84%

2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 77%

Snow braking

1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 85%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 83%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
73%

Firestone
Multiseason 2
66%

Exterior noise

1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 81%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 71%

Comfort

1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 67%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 67%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 71 dB

2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Multiseason 2
74%

Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
70%

Price/value

1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 83%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 71%

Mileage

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 71%

2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 70%

Rolling resistance

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 81%

2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 59%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 ?

2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
67%

Firestone
Multiseason 2
66%

Dry braking

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 63%

2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 60%

Dry handling

1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 74%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 69%

Add to comparison

Mutual tests

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2023 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	37.7	45
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S	41.4	49.8
Firestone Multiseason 2	41.8	47.9
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2023 225/45 R17

Name
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory
Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Satisfactory
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2022 195/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	39,9	44,4
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S	44,4	51,9
Firestone Multiseason 2	45,9	48,9
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2022 195/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1-	1
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Good	2-	2-	2+	2+
Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2021 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	1	1
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	2	2	1
Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2+	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2021 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	37,6	50
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S	41,5	54,4
Firestone Multiseason 2	42,4	54,1
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1	2+	1	1
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory	2	2	2+	3
Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Good	2	2+	2+	1
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	39,7	45
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S	44,3	49,3
Firestone Multiseason 2	41,2	49,3
Show test details

Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Firestone Multiseason 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands