• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Vredestein Quatrac

# Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
/73%
Vredestein Quatrac
/94%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR13 - R20 R15 - R17
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

The Kumho HA32 Solus 4S and the Vredestein Quatrac are both rated as allround tyres and have promising features. Made in China and Hungary, these tyres outperformed several competitors in a series of tests displayed on our website.


The Kumho HA32 Solus 4S has a rating of 73% from our verdict. Its strengths are reduced exterior noise levels, considerable snow braking, and controlled aquaplaning, which made it take the 10th place among 32 tyres tested by Autobild. However, it has some shortcomings, which include slightly extended wet and dry braking, increased rolling resistance, and moderate aquaplaning reserves. Although it scored top in exterior noise in several test features, it's necessary to note its weaknesses for customers to make informed decisions. Find more about this tyre on Kumho manufacturer's page.


On the other hand, the Vredestein Quatrac is a perfect all-round tyre with a rating of 94%. It took the 2nd position among 32 tyres in Autobild's test and scored well in wet braking, wet circle cornering, dry braking, and comfort. The aquaplaning reserves allow it to thrive in all weather conditions, and it offers a pleasant noise comfort level. Despite offering an average mileage, the impressive features put it at the front of its competitors. Discover more about this tyre on the Vredestein manufacturer's page.


In comparison, while Kumho HA32 Solus 4S scores well on noise comfort and snow braking, it struggles with some extended braking distances and increased rolling resistance, which might be factors to consider for certain drivers. Vredestein Quatrac, with its superior wet and dry performance and comfort, is clearly a top contender but falls short in the mileage category.


Verdict: While both the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S and the Vredestein Quatrac are compelling all-round tyre options, the Vredestein Quatrac edges out the Kumho with its superior performance in different conditions and maintains a higher overall rating. The decision may come down to certain factors like noise comfort, aquaplaning capabilities, wet braking, and cornering performance that are important to the driver.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test37.745
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S41.449.8
Vredestein Quatrac40.345.4
Show test details
Name
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Rating: Satisfactory
Vredestein Quatrac
Rating: Exemplary
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,944,4
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S44,451,9
Vredestein Quatrac41,747,1
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test1-2+1-1
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Rating: Good
2-2-2+2+
Vredestein Quatrac
Rating: Satisfactory
2+22+2-
Show test details
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test12+1
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Rating: Satisfactory
22-3+
Vredestein Quatrac
Rating: Exemplary
1- 2+ 2+
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test12+11
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Rating: Satisfactory
222+3
Vredestein Quatrac
Rating: Exemplary
1 1-21
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,745
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S44,349,3
Vredestein Quatrac40,646,3
Show test details