Segment
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle2. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Yokohama (35%). In this particular case, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S has a better rating of 64% compared to 31% of the Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21. The first tyre test of Kumho HA32 Solus 4S was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the HA32 Solus 4S and the BluEarth-4S AW21 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Kumho HA32 Solus 4S dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 also have B wet ratings. We also know where HA32 Solus 4S is made - China.
# | Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
| Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R14 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle2. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Upper-middle
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
1. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Satisfactory2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
1. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Satisfactory2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41.4 | 49.8 | |||||
Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 | 42.9 | 52.4 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,3 | 49,3 | |||||
Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 | 44 | 52,9 | |||||
Show test details |