• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Yokohama (39%). In this particular case, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S has a better rating of 73% compared to 24% of the Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21. The first tyre test of Kumho HA32 Solus 4S was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the HA32 Solus 4S and the BluEarth-4S AW21 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 93% of Kumho HA32 Solus 4S dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (77%) of the Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 also have B wet ratings. We also know where HA32 Solus 4S is made - China.

# Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
/73%
Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21
/24%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR13 - R20 R14 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test37.745
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S41.449.8
Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW2142.952.4
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,745
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S44,349,3
Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW214452,9
Show test details