Segment
1. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Premium2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein winter tyres are slightly better rated (53%) than Kumho (48%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter has a better rating of 48% compared to 40% of the Kumho PorTran CW51. The first tyre test of Kumho PorTran CW51 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the PorTran CW51 and the Comtrac 2 Winter were tested.
# | Kumho PorTran CW51 | Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Premium2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended2. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Still recommended
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended2. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Still recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Kumho PorTran CW51 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,6 | 4,1 | 3,0 | 2,6 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2,6 | 2,9 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
Show test details |