Segment
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle2. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Nokian (52%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho Solus HA31 and Nokian WeatherProof, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kumho Solus HA31 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WeatherProof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Solus HA31 and the WeatherProof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Solus HA31 has C wet grip rating, whereas 67% of Nokian WeatherProof has B rating.
# | Kumho Solus HA31
| Nokian WeatherProof
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle2. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle
2. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
1. Nokian WeatherProof Good +2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory2. Nokian WeatherProof Sufficient
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
Nokian WeatherProof | 44,5 | 51,3 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 203 | 14 | 37 | 39 | 28 | ||
Kumho Solus HA31 | 160 | 50 | 37 | 42 | 31 | ||
Nokian WeatherProof | 203 | 67 | 62 | 42 | 32 | ||
Show test details |