• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Nokian WeatherProof

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Nokian (52%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho Solus HA31 and Nokian WeatherProof, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kumho Solus HA31 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WeatherProof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Solus HA31 and the WeatherProof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Solus HA31 has C wet grip rating, whereas 67% of Nokian WeatherProof has B rating.

# Kumho Solus HA31
/0%
Nokian WeatherProof
/0%

Add to comparison

Kumho
Nokian
DimensionsR13 - R18 R13 - R19
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,546,3
Kumho Solus HA3143,849,5
Nokian WeatherProof44,551,3
Show test details
ACE
Name Points totalWinterWetDryEnviromental impact
Best values in test20314373928
Kumho Solus HA311605037 4231
Nokian WeatherProof203 67624232
Show test details