Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Kumho (48%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR D4 has a better rating of 54% compared to 47% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP51. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the WinterCraft WP51 and the WR D4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 has C wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WinterCraft WP51 is made in Korea and WR D4 is made in Finland.
# | Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | Nokian WR D4 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R13 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
1. Nokian WR D4 72%
2. Nokian WR D4 79%
1. Nokian WR D4 79%
2. Nokian WR D4 76%
2. Nokian WR D4 77%
1. Nokian WR D4 74%
1. Nokian WR D4 86%
1. Nokian WR D4 77%
2. Nokian WR D4 73%
1. Nokian WR D4 79%
2. Nokian WR D4 75%
1. Nokian WR D4 84%
2. Nokian WR D4 79%
2. Nokian WR D4 ? dB
1. Nokian WR D4 95%
2. Nokian WR D4 60%
1. Nokian WR D4 99%
2. Nokian WR D4 64%
2. Nokian WR D4 70%
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: Recommended | 2,8 | 2,7 | 3,2 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,3 |
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Recommended | 2,9 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 3,0 | 1,7 |
Show test details |
Name | Points total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 9,1 | ||||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 6,4 | ||||||
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Recommended | 8,1 | ||||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 206 | 67 | 68 | 43 | 19 | 8 | 10 |
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: Recommended | 183 | 60 | 56 | 40 | 13 | 5 | 9 |
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Recommended | 195 | 65 | 58 | 40 | 19 | 6 | 7 |
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 |
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 3,2 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 2,0 | 2,6 |
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,5 | 1,8 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 3,0 | 1,7 |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 38,8 | 28 | |||||
Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 27,6 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,4 | 2,6 | 2,4 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,3 |
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,3 | 1,7 | 2,4 | 3,6 | 3,0 | 1,9 |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | ||||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 41,0 | ||||||
Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 26,0 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 415 | 144 | 136 | 144 | |||
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: - | 338 | 107 | 111 | 120 | |||
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Highly recommended | 399 | 127 | 136 | 136 | |||
Show test details |