• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Table of contents:

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Falken (58%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has a better rating of 61% compared to 53% of the Falken EuroWinter HS01. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 was done in 2022, compared to 2017 when was the Falken EuroWinter HS01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the WinterCraft WP52 and the EuroWinter HS01 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Falken EuroWinter HS01 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WinterCraft WP52 is made in Korea and EuroWinter HS01 is made in Turkey.

# Kumho WinterCraft WP52
/61%
Falken EuroWinter HS01
/53%

Add to comparison

New comparison
Kumho
Falken
DimensionsR13 - R21 R13 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,825,4
Kumho WinterCraft WP5235,927,3
Falken EuroWinter HS0136,325,9
Show test details
Autobild
Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+2+2+
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Rating: Satisfactory		3+22-2
Falken EuroWinter HS01
Rating: Good		2-2-22
Show test details