Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Matador (33%). The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 was done in 2016, compared to 2022 when was the Matador MP93 Nordicca first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Matador MP93 Nordicca also have C wet ratings.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP71
| Matador MP93 Nordicca
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
