Segment
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WS71 vs. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Kumho (38%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho WinterCraft WS71 and Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WS71 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho WinterCraft WS71 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WS71
| Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Test winner2. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Satisfactory
