Segment
1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Premium2. Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli). Generally, Pirelli winter tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Linglong (0%). But when it comes to comparing Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP and Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 225/50 R17 test, where both the Green-Max Winter UHP and the Winter Sottozero 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R17 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Premium2. Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP Lowcost
1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Exemplary
1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Still recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 1,5 | |
Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP Rating: Poor | 5,5 | 3,5 | 2,2 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 2,5 | |
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 3,3 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 3,6 | 2,5 | |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP | 35,2 | - | |||||
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 | 31,3 | 26,4 | |||||
Show test details |