Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Matador MP92 Sibir Snow SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Matador (33%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow SUV has C wet grip rating, whereas 72% of Kumho Ecsta PS71 has A rating.
| # | Matador MP92 Sibir Snow SUV
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
