Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
Comparison: Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Matador (33%). The first tyre test of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow was done in 2015, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow has C wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has B rating.
| # | Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R13 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
