Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Matador MPS125 Variant vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Matador (0%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MPS125 Variant has C wet grip rating, whereas 77% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating.
| # | Matador MPS125 Variant
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
