Segment
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Matador (33%). But when it comes to comparing Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van and Kumho PorTran CW51, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the MPS530 Sibir Snow Van and the PorTran CW51 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (67%) of the Kumho PorTran CW51 also have C wet ratings.
# | Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van
| Kumho PorTran CW51
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,2 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,8 | 3,0 | 2,6 |
Kumho PorTran CW51 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,6 | 4,1 | 3,0 | 2,6 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
Show test details |