Segment
1. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Lowcost2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Maxxis) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Maxxis winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Matador (33%). But when it comes to comparing Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 and Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the Vansmart Snow WL2 and the MPS530 Sibir Snow Van were tested.
# | Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2
| Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R12 - R17 | R14 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Lowcost2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
1. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended2. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Still recommended
1. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended2. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Still recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Rating: Not recommended | 2,7 | 2,5 | 5,0 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 1,9 |
Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,2 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,8 | 3,0 | 2,6 |
Show test details |