Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle2. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Maxxis) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Yokohama winter tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Maxxis (50%). But when it comes to comparing Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 and Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the Vansmart Snow WL2 and the BluEarth winter WY01 were tested.
# | Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2
| Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R12 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle2. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Lowcost
1. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Still recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
1. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Still recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Rating: Not recommended | 2,7 | 2,5 | 5,0 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 1,9 |
Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,2 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
Show test details |