Segment
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. Minerva Frostrack HP Lowcost
Comparison: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Minerva Frostrack HP
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Minerva). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than Minerva (0%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin Alpin 5 and Minerva Frostrack HP, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Michelin Alpin 5 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Minerva Frostrack HP first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Alpin 5 and the Frostrack HP were tested.
| # | Michelin Alpin 5
| Minerva Frostrack HP
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice lateral guidance
Ice braking
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 37,1 | 28,4 | |||||
| Minerva Frostrack HP | 41,7 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
