• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 vs. Nokian WR SUV 3

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 has a better rating of 28% compared to 24% of the Nokian WR SUV 3. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the Latitude Alpin LA2 and the WR SUV 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (80%) of the Nokian WR SUV 3 also have C wet ratings.

# Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2
/28%
Nokian WR SUV 3
/24%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR16 - R21 R15 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name Points totalWetDrySnow
Best values in test406147134143
Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2
Rating: Test winner
406 143120143
Nokian WR SUV 3
Rating: Highly recommended
390131128131
Show test details
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test12+2+
Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2
Rating: -
22-2+
Nokian WR SUV 3
Rating: -
223+
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowIce
Best values in test2+1-11-
Michelin Latitude Alpin LA232-23+
Nokian WR SUV 32+ 1- 1 1-
Show test details