• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV has a better rating of 93% compared to 64% of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV. The first tyre test of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV was done in 2020, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 255/55 R18 test, where both the Pilot Sport 4 SUV and the Ecsta PS71 SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (94%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV also have A wet ratings. We also know where Pilot Sport 4 SUV is made - Poland/Spain.

# Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
/93%
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
/64%

Add to comparison

Michelin
Kumho
DimensionsR17 - R23 R17 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDryOffroad
Best values in test1-2+2
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Rating: Good
2+22
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
Rating: Good
222
Show test details