Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Premium2. Nokian Line Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs. Nokian Line
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Nokian (62%). The first tyre test of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Nokian Line first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 84% of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Line also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Pilot Sport 4 is made in Spain/Germany and Line is made in Finland.
| # | Michelin Pilot Sport 4
| Nokian Line
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Line 12.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Highly recommended2. Nokian Line Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
2. Nokian Line 80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Nokian Line 84%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian Line 72%
Wet braking
2. Nokian Line 84%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian Line 87%
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Nokian Line 80%
Dry handling
2. Nokian Line 83%
Dry lane changing
2. Nokian Line 85%
Dry steering response
2. Nokian Line 60%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian Line 78%
Mileage
2. Nokian Line 63%
Price/value
2. Nokian Line 30%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian Line 72%
Comfort
2. Nokian Line 60%
