Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Premium2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium
Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Table of contents:
| # | Michelin Pilot Sport 4
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R17 - R24 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Comparing the two widely renowned summer tyres, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, we can analyze their strengths and weaknesses based on multiple test results. Michelin, a French tyre manufacturer, has a long history of producing top-quality tyres, while Vredestein, from the Netherlands, is also known for its high-performance summer tyres.
The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 (rated at 94%) was a successor to the Michelin Pilot Sport 3 and has now been replaced by the Michelin Pilot Sport 5. These tyres are made in Spain and Germany, while the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti (rated at 87%) is made in the Netherlands.
Test Results:
Autobild Test: Out of 9 tested tyres, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 ranked first, excelling particularly in aquaplaning (longitudinal, cross), dry braking, and wet handling. On the other hand, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti secured third place, proving its strength in aquaplaning (cross), wet braking, wet handling, wet side guide, and dry handling.
ADAC Test: Among 16 tested tyres, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 occupied the second position, performing best in dry braking and mileage. Meanwhile, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti came in at the 7th place, demonstrating strong performance in mileage and exterior noise.
Automotorsport Test: In a comparison of 11 tyres, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 emerged as the winner, with top scores in dry braking, dry lane changing, wet braking, wet handling, wet handling-objective, and wet safety. The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, however, was ranked 11th, showing its best performance in dry lane changing.
Verdict:
Overall, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 outperforms the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti in most tests, showcasing its superiority in both wet and dry handling, braking, and aquaplaning. Nonetheless, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti still proves to be a reliable tyre, specifically in terms of mileage and exterior noise.
With their strengths and weaknesses laid out, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 would be the recommended tyre for those who prioritize superior performance across various conditions. On the other hand, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti is a decent alternative for those focusing on the tyre's mileage and exterior noise.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 1- | 2- | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 | 32,1 | 29,8 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 33,4 | 31,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 1,9 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Exemplary | 1 | 1 | 1- | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 | 34,2 | 29,6 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 35,3 | 30,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,8 | 9,3 | 10 | |||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 | 9,4 | 9,8 | 9,3 | 8,3 | |||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 6,9 | 6,6 | 7,7 | 5,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
