14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

#	Michelin Pilot Sport 5 /96%	Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 /82%

Dimensions	R17 - R21	R17 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

In the world of ultra-high performance (UUHP) summer tyres, two names are often top contenders: The Michelin Pilot Sport 5 and the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127. Both tyres are strong performers in their category, with excellent ratings and impressive test results. However, each also has its distinctive strengths and weaknesses.

The Michelin Pilot Sport 5, successor of the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and 3, scored a high 97% in our ratings. The tyre manifests its strength in terms of durability, with test results from TyreReviews.com highlighting the longest tread life among all tyres tested. Simultaneously, it stands out for solid performance across various conditions, good steering, and low ecological impact. Although, improvement in wet grip and a more pocket-friendly price are needed as per our observation.

On the other hand, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127, made in Korea, earned a respectable 74%, noted for its great value for money. Test results emphasized excellent wet grip and lower energy use as its strong points. However, it lacks in terms of steering response and aquaplaning resistance compared to its competition.

In mutual test positions, both Michelin and Hankook show strong performances. In the Die Reifentester, both ranked 4th out of 8. In the Tyre Reviews, Michelin scored high in Aquaplaning - cross, Dry handling, and Wear. Hankook stood out for its Price/value. In ACE's extensive test over 10 tyres, Michelin finished third, while Hankook rated seventh. Autobild's comparison of 50 tyres had Michelin at the sixth and Hankook at the impressive first position, emphasizing their exceptional braking capabilities in both wet and dry conditions.

Overall, both Michelin and Hankook produce excellent UUHP tyres. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 leads in terms of durability and varied conditions performance, albeit at a higher cost. Conversely, Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 provides excellent value for money and commendable wet grip. Careful consideration of specific needs and preferences will determine the suitable choice between these two leading tyres.

Segment

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Premium

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 109

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 53

Number of tests

1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 19x

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 13x

Best position in test

1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 1.

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 1.

Worst position in test

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 6.

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 14.

Average position in tests

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 3

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 6.11

Year of the last test

1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 2025

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 2025

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Test winner

Worst rating in test

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Good

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Pilot Sport 5

80%

Hankook
Ventus S1 evo3 K127

70%

Wet handling

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 77%

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 77%

Wet braking

1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 95%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 89%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 90%

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 45%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 81%

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 67%

Wet circle cornering

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 84%

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 80%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 A

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 A

Dry

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Pilot Sport 5

78%

Hankook
Ventus S1 evo3 K127

74%

Dry braking

1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 86%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 80%

Dry handling

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 79%

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 76%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Pilot Sport 5

82%

Hankook
Ventus S1 evo3 K127

59%

Rolling resistance

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 78%

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 75%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 C

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 C

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Ventus S1 evo3 K127

74%

Michelin
Pilot Sport 5

71%

Exterior noise

1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 75%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 65%

Comfort

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 78%

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 74%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 ?

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Die Reifentester Summer tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Good
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Good
Show test details

Tyre Reviews Summer tyre test 2023 225/40 R18

Name
Best values in test	1
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Highly recommended	1
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Recommended	1
Show test details

ACE Summer tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	71	54	19	7
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Highly recommended	70	50	18	5
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Highly recommended	62	50	17	6
Show test details