Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
| # | Michelin Pilot Sport 5
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Let us compare two summer tyres: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 and Kumho Ecsta PS71. From Michelin, the Pilot Sport 5 is an Ultra Ultra High Performance (UUHP) tyre that offers an exceptionally high level of performance with our rating at 96%. This model was preceded by the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and 3, and has no current successor.
On the other hand, we have the Kumho Ecsta PS71 from Kumho, a summer tyre with our rating at 76%, without any mentioned previous models or subsequent replacements.
Test results from AutoBild rank the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 at position 6/50, offering mileage and excellent wet braking as its peak features. The Kumho Ecsta PS71 ranks 12/50, demonstrating excellent reserve capacity at aquaplaning, comfort, wet braking, and handling as its top characteristics.
Further data from AutoBild 2025 indicates that the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 demonstrates dynamic handling and short braking distances on wet and dry tracks as well as excellent mileage. On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 shines with efficient aquaplaning features and safe dynamics, and short braking distances.
ADAC ranks the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 at position 3/18 while the Kumho Ecsta PS71 ranks 13/18. ACE rankings are similar with Pilot Sport 5 at 3/10, primarily for its cross aquaplaning feature, and the Ecsta PS71 at 7/10 for its longitudinal aquaplaning attribute.
ACE 2023 analysis concludes that Michelin Pilot Sport 5 offers precise steering and outstanding driving dynamics, string aquaplaning reserves, and short wet and dry braking distances. Its top drawback appears to be its high price. Meanwhile, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 comes with a high perfomance potential, good handling, short wet and dry braking distances and proves to be price-friendly. The cons include a slightly higher driving noise.
Overall, while the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 stands as the better choice with its precise steering, dynamic drive and excellent mileage, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 proves to be a solid and cost-effective selection with its good handling and efficient aquaplaning features.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Test winner
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,5 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Good | 1,9 | 1,9 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 2,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | 33.5 | 27.7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34.2 | 27.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 71 | 54 | 19 | 7 | |||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Highly recommended | 70 | 50 | 18 | 5 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Highly recommended | 67 | 47 | 18 | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Outstanding | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | 60.1 | 26 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 61.7 | 26.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
