Segment
2. Minerva Ice-Plus S210 Lowcost
Comparison: Minerva Ice-Plus S210 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Minerva) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Minerva (0%). The first tyre test of Minerva Ice-Plus S210 was done in 2016, compared to 2020 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the Ice-Plus S210 and the Winter i*cept evo3 W330 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Minerva Ice-Plus S210
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Minerva Ice-Plus S210 35.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Minerva Ice-Plus S210 | 41,9 | - | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 | 35,2 | 30,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Minerva Ice-Plus S210 Rating: Not recommended | 4- | 2 | 4- | ||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
