Segment
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Premium2. Minerva Ice-Plus S210 Lowcost
Comparison: Minerva Ice-Plus S210 vs. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Minerva) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Minerva (0%). The first tyre test of Minerva Ice-Plus S210 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Vredestein Wintrac Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the Ice-Plus S210 and the Wintrac Pro were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Minerva Ice-Plus S210
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Minerva Ice-Plus S210 35.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Minerva Ice-Plus S210 | 41,9 | - | |||||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro | 36,4 | 30,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Minerva Ice-Plus S210 Rating: Not recommended | 4- | 2 | 4- | ||||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
