Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Premium2. Nexen N FERA SPORT SUV Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen N FERA SPORT SUV vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Nexen (67%). The first tyre test of Nexen N FERA SPORT SUV was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/65 R17 test, where both the N FERA SPORT SUV and the Pilot Sport 4 SUV were tested.
| # | Nexen N FERA SPORT SUV
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R17 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Mud traction
Sand traction
Handling on gravel
Grass traction
Gravel traction
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nexen N fera Sport SUV Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
