14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than Nexen (47%). But when it comes to comparing Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 and Continental WinterContact TS 860, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2018 205/55 R16 test, where both the Winguard Snow G WH2 and the WinterContact TS 860 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

#	Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R13	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 73

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 1

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 7x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 6.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 37.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 14

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 2018

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Recommended

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Still recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

82%

Nexen
Winguard Snow G WH2

79%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 78%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 77%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

90%

Nexen
Winguard Snow G WH2

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 82%

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 65%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 94%

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 72%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 86%

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 42%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 96%

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 82%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 79%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

89%

Nexen
Winguard Snow G WH2

80%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 84%

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 74%

Snow traction

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 92%

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 84%

Snow braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 84%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

78%

Nexen
Winguard Snow G WH2

77%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 82%

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 57%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

85%

Nexen
Winguard Snow G WH2

77%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 83%

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 74%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

81%

Nexen
Winguard Snow G WH2

81%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2018 205/55 R16

Name	Points total
Best values in test	9,1
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Rating: Still recommended	7,3
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Highly recommended	9,1
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2018 185/65 R15

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise	Running costs
Best values in test	206	67	68	43	19	8	10
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Rating: Recommended	181	60	51	42	14	5	9
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Test winner	206	66	68	43	16	7	6
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2018 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,1	2,0	1,8	2,3	3,0	1,0	1,7
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,6	2,3	2,7	2,5	3,2	1,5	2,5
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Good	2,1	2,5	1,9	2,5	3,0	2,0	1,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2	36,8	29,4
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,5	27,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2	42,8	-
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,2	25,6
Show test details

GTÜ Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	412	142	127	143	25	10
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Rating: Recommended	341	86	119	136	20	8
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Highly recommended	412	142	127	143	25	9
Show test details

Comparison: Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands