Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUV vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Nokian (62%). The first tyre test of Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUV was done in 2020, compared to 2018 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Vibilagare 2020 225/60 R18 test, where both the Hakka Blue 2 SUV and the Turanza T005 were tested.
| # | Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUV
| Bridgestone Turanza T005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 91 | 21 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUV | 78 | 48 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 74 | 40 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
