Segment
1. Nokian Line Upper-middle2. Nokian cLine VAN Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Nokian cLine VAN
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. In this particular case, the Nokian cLine VAN has a better rating of 50% compared to 35% of the Nokian Line. The first tyre test of Nokian Line was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian cLine VAN first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Line dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian cLine VAN also have A wet ratings. We also know where Line is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian Line | Nokian cLine VAN | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Line 12.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian Line 74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 79%
Wet handling
2. Nokian Line 84%
Wet braking
2. Nokian Line 71%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Nokian Line 68%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian Line 82%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian cLine VAN 70 dB2. Nokian Line ? dB