Segment
1. Nokian Line Upper-middle2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Nokian zLine
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. But when it comes to comparing Nokian Line and Nokian zLine, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian Line was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian zLine first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Line dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian zLine also have A wet ratings. We also know where Line is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian Line
| Nokian zLine
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian Line 17.2. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian zLine 7.382. Nokian Line 12.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian zLine 75%2. Nokian Line 72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 84%2. Nokian zLine 83%
Wet handling
1. Nokian zLine 85%2. Nokian Line 80%
Wet braking
1. Nokian zLine 90%2. Nokian Line 84%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian Line 87%2. Nokian zLine 60%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
1. Nokian zLine 93%2. Nokian Line 83%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian zLine 90%2. Nokian Line 78%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian zLine 75%2. Nokian Line 72%
