Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Premium2. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Nokian (61%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 has a better rating of 97% compared to 64% of the Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV. The first tyre test of Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV was done in 2023, compared to 2024 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the STRAßENVERKEHR 2024 235/55 R18 test, where both the Snowproof 2 SUV and the Blizzak 6 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 also have B wet ratings.
# | Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Premium2. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Exemplary2. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Recommended
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 7.3 | 7.3 | 6.4 | 7.0 | 6.0 | ||
Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Rating: Good | 7.3 | 7.3 | 7.7 | 7.5 | 7.4 | ||
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Very good | 9.2 | 9.0 | 9.4 | 7.7 | 6.5 | ||
Show test details |