Segment
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 Upper-middle2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Snowproof 2 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber winter tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Nokian (61%). In this particular case, the Nokian Snowproof 2 has a better rating of 71% compared to 69% of the Kleber KRISALP HP3. The first tyre test of Nokian Snowproof 2 was done in 2023, compared to 2017 when was the Kleber KRISALP HP3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Snowproof 2 and the KRISALP HP3 were tested.
| # | Nokian Snowproof 2
| Kleber KRISALP HP3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Snowproof 2 12.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary2. Nokian Snowproof 2 Recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian Snowproof 2 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Nokian Snowproof 2 | 40.0 | 30.5 | |||||
| Kleber Krisalp HP3 | 37.8 | 29.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
