Segment
2. Nokian Wetproof SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Nokian (62%). In this particular case, the Nokian Wetproof SUV has a better rating of 55% compared to 46% of the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5. The first tyre test of Nokian Wetproof SUV was done in 2021, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Promobil 2022 235/55 R17 test, where both the Wetproof SUV and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Wetproof SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (74%) of the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 also have A wet ratings.
# | Nokian Wetproof SUV
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian Wetproof SUV Upper-middle
1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary
Name | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 7,3 | 7,7 | 5,9 | ||||
Nokian WetProof SUV Rating: Recommended | 8,0 | 7,9 | 7,3 | ||||
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Recommended | 7,9 | 8,4 | 5,9 | ||||
Show test details |