Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Nokian (61%). The first tyre test of Nokian WR A4 was done in 2017, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the WR A4 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Nokian WR A4 has B wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating.
# | Nokian WR A4
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R14 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle
2. Nokian WR A4 17.
2. Nokian WR A4 9.83
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good2. Nokian WR A4 Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR A4 Still recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
Nokian WR A4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
Nokian WR A4 | 34,6 | 25,5 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 30,3 | 24,5 | |||||
Show test details |