Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 92% compared to 54% of the Nokian WR D4. The first tyre test of Nokian WR D4 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WR D4 is made in Finland and Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland.
# | Nokian WR D4 | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R14 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
2. Nokian WR D4 6.04
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
2. Nokian WR D4 73%
1. Nokian WR D4 79%
2. Nokian WR D4 78%
1. Nokian WR D4 90%
2. Nokian WR D4 75%
2. Nokian WR D4 77%
2. Nokian WR D4 75%
2. Nokian WR D4 76%
2. Nokian WR D4 82%
2. Nokian WR D4 76%
2. Nokian WR D4 75%
2. Nokian WR D4 77%
2. Nokian WR D4 74%
1. Nokian WR D4 94%
1. Nokian WR D4 86%
2. Nokian WR D4 81%
2. Nokian WR D4 71%
2. Nokian WR D4 ? dB
1. Nokian WR D4 65%
1. Nokian WR D4 85%
1. Nokian WR D4 99%
1. Nokian WR D4 79%
2. Nokian WR D4 65%
2. Nokian WR D4 68%