Segment
2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Nokian (61%). The first tyre test of Nokian WR D4 was done in 2015, compared to 2022 when was the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Nokian WR D4 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 also have B wet ratings. We also know where WR D4 is made - Finland.
# | Nokian WR D4
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
2. Nokian WR D4 6.04
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Highly recommended
2. Nokian WR D4 Recommended
1. Nokian WR D4 81%
1. Nokian WR D4 72%
2. Nokian WR D4 78%
2. Nokian WR D4 70%
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
2. Nokian WR D4 73%
2. Nokian WR D4 76%
2. Nokian WR D4 72%
1. Nokian WR D4 89%
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 94%
1. Nokian WR D4 69%
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
1. Nokian WR D4 71%
1. Nokian WR D4 86%
2. Nokian WR D4 67%
1. Nokian WR D4 99%
1. Nokian WR D4 79%
1. Nokian WR D4 82%
1. Nokian WR D4 85%