Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR D4 vs. Nokian WR SUV 3
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR D4 and Nokian WR SUV 3, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B wet grip rating, whereas 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 has C rating. We also know where WR D4 is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian WR D4
| Nokian WR SUV 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.252. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Nokian WR D4 81%
Dry driving behavior
1. Nokian WR D4 72%
Dry handling
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 100%2. Nokian WR D4 78%
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Nokian WR D4 76%
Wet braking
2. Nokian WR D4 70%
Wet handling
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian WR D4 73%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian WR D4 72%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
1. Nokian WR D4 89%
Snow braking
2. Nokian WR D4 91%
Snow handling
2. Nokian WR D4 91%
Snow cornering
2. Nokian WR D4 94%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
Interior noise
1. Nokian WR D4 69%
Comfort
2. Nokian WR D4 71%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
1. Nokian WR D4 86%
Mileage
1. Nokian WR D4 67%
Rolling resistance
1. Nokian WR D4 99%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
1. Nokian WR D4 85%
Ice lateral guidance
1. Nokian WR D4 82%
