Segment
2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 4 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Nokian (52%). The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 4 was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Continental WinterContact TS 870 P has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WR SUV 4 is made in Russian Federation and WinterContact TS 870 P is made in Czech Republic.
| # | Nokian WR SUV 4
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Lateral guidance on snow
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry steering response
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 100%
