Segment
2. Nokian zLine SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine SUV vs. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Nokian (62%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian zLine SUV and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the zLine SUV and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine SUV has A wet grip rating, whereas 50% of Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 has B rating.
| # | Nokian zLine SUV
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Highly recommended2. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory2. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Still recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Nokian zLine SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
