Segment
1. Pirelli P ZERO Premium2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. Pirelli P ZERO
Table of contents:
| # | Nokian zLine
| Pirelli P ZERO
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In the world of performance tyres, the Nokian zLine and Pirelli P ZERO are known to be excellent options for summer use. Manufactured by reputable companies, these tyres promise to deliver your need for speed, safety and durability. However, it's not easy to choose between them, especially given the mixed results in different tyre tests.
Nokian zLine:
The Nokian zLine is a summer tyre developed by Nokian featuring outstanding dry handling. It performed well in the ACE test by securing the 3rd position out of 11 tyres tested, besting its features in dry handling. However, it slightly lags in other tests, as it was ranked 6th in the Automotorsport and GTÜ tests, and 7th in the ADAC test. Overall, despite the lower ranking in some tests, Nokian zLine is still a considerable choice due to its reliable dry handling and its performance across the board.
Pirelli P ZERO:
On the other side, we have the Pirelli P ZERO, a summer tyre made in Italy by Pirelli. Known for its strength in various handling features, the P ZERO took the lead by ranking 1st in the Sportauto test. It also showed a strong presence in the Automotorsport, ADAC and GTÜ tests, securing 4th position in each of these. Moreover, Pirelli P ZERO was noted for its impressive features such as dry handling, dry lane changing, dry steering responsiveness, and different wet handling aspects, among others. Despite being 7th in the ACE test, this tyre's overall striking performance in various tests put it in a favorable position.
Conclusion:
It's not easy to declare an absolute winner between the Nokian zLine and the Pirelli P ZERO as both show commendable performance in various aspects. Still, considering the test positions and features, it seems that the Pirelli P ZERO has a slight advantage, particularly in wet handling and overall performance. However, for dry handling enthusiasts, the Nokian zLine might prove to be a better option. Ultimately, the best choice depends on the specific needs and driving conditions of the vehicle user.
Don't forget that these models may get replaced by newer versions in the future, so make sure to stay updated by checking our website regularly. Check out the detailed reviews and test results of the Nokian zLine and Pirelli P ZERO for a deeper dive into each tyre's specifics.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
1. Pirelli P ZERO 6.062. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli P ZERO Good2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Wet handling
2. Nokian zLine 85%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian zLine 75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian zLine 83%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Nokian zLine 85%
Dry handling
1. Nokian zLine 93%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian zLine 75%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,8 | 9,3 | 10 | |||
| Nokian zLine | 7,8 | 8,0 | 7,3 | 9,0 | |||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 8,3 | 8,5 | 8,6 | 5,9 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 150 | 55 | 39 | 14 | 7 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Recommended | 149 | 63 | 47 | 18 | 7 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Recommended | 141 | 58 | 50 | 16 | 8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
| Nokian zLine | 240 | 119 | 121 | 22 | 9 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 263 | 133 | 130 | 13 | 9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,3 | 6 | 7,6 | 7 | |||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Recommended | 8,2 | 8,4 | 8 | 8,4 | |||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Highly recommended | 9,3 | 9,2 | 9,7 | 7,7 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
