Segment
1. Riken Road Performance Lowcost2. Westlake Z-107 Lowcost
Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. Westlake Z-107
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Riken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Westlake). But when it comes to comparing Riken Road Performance and Westlake Z-107, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Riken Road Performance was done in 2021, compared to 2023 when was the Westlake Z-107 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Road Performance and the Z-107 were tested.
| # | Riken Road Performance
| Westlake Z-107
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Westlake Z-107 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Westlake Z-107 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | ||||||
| Riken Road Performance Rating: Poor | 3,1 | ||||||
| Westlake Z-107 Rating: Sufficient | 3,7 | 2,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
