Segment
1. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Premium2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Eskimo S3+ vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Vredestein (60%). But when it comes to comparing Sava Eskimo S3+ and Vredestein Snowtrac 5, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Eskimo S3+ and the Snowtrac 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Sava Eskimo S3+
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.22. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 12.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Satisfactory2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Still recommended2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow handling
Snow braking
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Ice lateral guidance
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2,8 | 3,6 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: Recommended | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,7 | 2,4 | 3,1 | 2,5 | 1,8 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,9 | 2,5 | 1,8 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
| Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 3,3 | 1,9 | 2,4 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 3,8 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo S3+ | 43,0 | 28,7 | |||||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 | 44,8 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
