Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Premium2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Vredestein (34%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Intensa UHP 2 and the Ultrac Satin were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R16 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 12.86
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Highly recommended2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Still recommended2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,3 | 38,3 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin | 36,2 | 37,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
