Segment
1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle2. Superia Bluewin SUV 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Superia Bluewin SUV 2 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Superia) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Superia (3%). The first tyre test of Superia Bluewin SUV 2 was done in 2023, compared to 2020 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/60 R18 test, where both the Bluewin SUV 2 and the Winterhawk 4 were tested.
| # | Superia Bluewin SUV 2
| Firestone Winterhawk 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Superia Bluewin SUV 2 Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
