Segment
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Toyo (58%). Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Proxes CF2 and the Roadhawk were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Toyo Proxes CF2
| Firestone Roadhawk
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 1,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,5 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 | 37,8 | 40,5 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 36,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
