Segment
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle2. Nexen N blue HD plus Lowcost
Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Nexen N blue HD plus
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Toyo (47%). In this particular case, the Nexen N blue HD plus has a better rating of 46% compared to 34% of the Toyo Proxes CF2. The first tyre test of Toyo Proxes CF2 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Nexen N blue HD plus first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Proxes CF2 and the N blue HD plus were tested.
| # | Toyo Proxes CF2 | Nexen N blue HD plus | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory2. Nexen N blue HD plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 ? dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 | 37,8 | 40,5 | |||||
| Nexen N blue HD plus | 38,3 | 40,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||