Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Tracmax X-Privilo TX-3 Lowcost
Comparison: Tracmax X-Privilo TX-3 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tracmax) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (56%) than Tracmax (5%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 73% compared to 5% of the Tracmax X-Privilo TX-3. The first tyre test of Tracmax X-Privilo TX-3 was done in 2020, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the X-Privilo TX-3 and the Ecsta HS52 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Tracmax X-Privilo TX-3
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Tracmax X-Privilo TX-3 | 39,2 | 32,5 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Tracmax X-Privilo TX-3 | 38,9 | 34,3 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
