Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Tristar Ice-Plus S210 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Tristar (0%). But when it comes to comparing Tristar Ice-Plus S210 and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Tristar Ice-Plus S210 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Ice-Plus S210 and the WR D4 were tested.
# | Tristar Ice-Plus S210
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Tristar Ice-Plus S210 Lowcost
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended
1. Nokian WR D4 89%
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 94%
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 70%
1. Nokian WR D4 76%
1. Nokian WR D4 72%
1. Nokian WR D4 69%
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
1. Nokian WR D4 71%
2. Nokian WR D4 81%
2. Nokian WR D4 78%
1. Nokian WR D4 99%
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
Tristar Ice-Plus S210 | 47,3 | - | |||||
Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 26,0 | |||||
Show test details |